Saturday, October 19, 2013

Literature Review

Well, it's been a while but I figured that I should keep you updated since this is about science fair and thus I am continuing this though in a different location. So I have decided on the question- Does the life span of a soap bubble increase or decrease in hot humid weather or in cold clear weather. Here is my literature Review-


Question and Hypothesis

Question

Does the life span of a soap bubble increase in cold clear weather or hot humid weather?

Hypothesis

My hypothesis is that the life span of the soap bubble will increase in cold clear weather.

Review of Literature

Bubbles have been around since the early 18th century and have continually developed ever since. Though bubbles range from different colors and sizes there are some things they have in common. For example, one thing all bubbles have in common are their shape, no matter how hard you try, you’ll always end up with a sphere shaped bubble. Different kinds of bubbles vary as well. There are gas bubbles, air bubbles, soap bubble…etc.

Soap bubbles are formed when soap and water are mixed; they become known as low-free-energy. There are two end of a soap molecule, the hydrophilic, which is attracted to water, and the hydrophobic hydrocarbon which tries to avoid water. When soap and water mingle the hydrophobic hydrocarbon forces its way to the top and spreads the water molecules. As the water molecules begin to separate the surface tension also decreases, thus, forming a soap bubble.  A soap bubble is a three layered film encasing a slight sphere of compressed air or gasses. The three layered film which involves a layer of water sandwiched by soapy films. These soapy film are, in comparison, much like a plastic film, able to hold what is on the inside, but once the center is gone, it folds in on itself.

All bubbles, soap or gas, form into a sphere. A sphere, unlike any of the other three dimensional shapes takes the absolute least amount of energy to form into. A sphere also enables the least amount of surface tension giving the bubble a longer life period. No matter how you blow a bubble, it will always form into a sphere.

Once a soap bubble is air born it has a short period of time before it evaporates or bumps into something and pops. To keep the bubbles alive longer add glycerol. Glycerol is found at your local drug store to enable the slowing of the water film thinning and helps slow down the process of evaporation. Like glycerol, polymer also helps slow down evaporation enabling a bubble to live longer. The recommended soap bubble solution, for a longer life span, is: 19 ml of soap in 750 ml of water and 1000 ml of glycerol.

The soap bubble solution is not the only contribution to a longer life span of the bubble but also the atmospheric pressure, temperature, chemical composition and how hard or soft the surface tension is. Henry’s law- The less atmospheric pressure, the less gas in the solution, along with Bernoulli’s principle: Pressure affects the long live of bubbles, both support this composition.

In warmer, humid air, a bubble is most likely to pop sooner than a bubble floating in cold, clear air. Bubbles pop for one of two reasons- The water evaporates or the bubble bumps into something and the pressure is too great. In warmer times, when the sun is out, the bubble will likely pop from the evaporation of the sun. The humidity would create a barometric pressure that would close in on the bubble and once overwhelmed the bubble would merely pop. In contradiction a bubble airborne on a cold day, when the sun is not as effective a bubble would most likely not pop, and since the air is clear there is no atmospheric pressure so the bubble is free to float in a vast area.

Today, bubbles are admired not only by adults and children but pets as well! Doing some experiments, companies were eventually able to create scent flavored bubbles. Now bubbles range from a smell of happy bubbles, bacon or even cat-nip! Giving pleasure to the whole family. Though it may surprise, bubbles are not only used for fun but also to help solve mathematical equations and help scientist get a better grasp on the universe.

Bibliography

Calvert, J.B. Bubbles and Soap. N.p., 20 Mar 2004. Web. 19 Oct 2013. <http://mysite.du.edu/~jcalvert/phys/bubbles.htm>.

Helminstine, Anne. "About.com." Bubble Science. N.p., n.d. Web. 19 Oct 2013. <http://chemistry.about.com/od/bubbles/a/bubblescience.htm>.

"Science Daily." Soap Bubbles. N.p., n.d. Web. 19 Oct 2013. <http://www.sciencedaily.com/articles/s/soap_bubble.htm>.


Smith, Lisa. "Ehow." The Effect of Temperature on Bubble Solution. N.p.. Web. 19 Oct 2013. <http://www.ehow.com/info_8744446_effect-temperature-bubble-solution.html>.

Pepling, Rachel. "Chemical & Engineering News." Soap Bubbles. N.p., 28 Apr 2003. Web. 19 Oct 2013. <https://pubs.acs.org/cen/whatstuff/stuff/8117sci3.html>.

 

 

 

Monday, September 9, 2013

Research questions

Research Question #1

Does the color of a room effect your sleep?
This question explores the human sleep, brain activity and the definition of color which is, "Color is light reflecting an object". If you notice a room's walls is usually painted white. Now if we painted it red, for example, would that stimulate our brain and give us less sleep. Or if we painted it blue, would it relax our brain and allow us to receive more sleep? This experiment could lead to an increase of sleep. Sleep incrassation leads to our brain being fresher and sharper thinking, which could increase grade results or the amount of work we get done at our jobs.

Research question #2

Can a human body feel an intrusion of space?
As you may have noticed, most people react when you invade their personal space. Approaching someone from behind, or leaning in close into their "bubble" can result in either them stepping away unconsciously or leaning away from you. This question explores the boundaries of this, can the human body actually "sense" when something is to close, or is this just a myth and we react after we see, hear or smell this object intruding.


Research question #3

Do different breeds of dogs respond differently according to smell, hearing or sight?
We've all read, seen or witnessed a dog smelling a human out, hearing a sound and leaping at it or merely seeing a loved one and jumping on them. This question explores the depths of these senses. German Shepard's use their noses more frequently then some dogs but are they quicker to respond if they hear a noise of a gun shot, smell a drug or see an intruder? I want to explore this with, at first, German Shepard's then after seeing the results of this, compare it to, say, a hunting dog such as a Spanish Pointer. Humans react mainly by sight, are different breeds of dogs any different?

Monday, August 26, 2013

Keep in Time

Voki-
copy this link and paste it on your browser's address bar.

http://www.voki.com/pickup.php?scid=8478424&height=267&width=200
Summary

The body is a clock, a clock that's been set to your schedule. Now though, researchers are trying to find a way to "reset" these clocks in our body. Back when the sun was our only source of light, these clocks where stronger, rise with the sun, sleep with the sun. But now, that we use artificial light our bodies are receiving weaker synchronizing signals, so it may be possible to reset these clocks to where our bodies will wake and sleep according to our own schedules. Researchers now believe it isn't entirely impossible for, waking up at 4 AM. to be a normal occurrence in our life. “We need huge databases where thousands to millions of people have contributed data from their daily life,” says Roenneberg. “Once we understand that, we can change our society and technology so that people can sleep in their proper, individual sleep windows.”

Questions

1. With the whole blue and red coloring thing, if we paint our rooms blue then will we be able to sleep better.

2. Is there a food that might make people drowsy and help them sleep better naturally?

3. How long does it take, exactly, for our bodies to readjust to different time adjustments?

Full Article

Highlighted Text-

Purpose: Purple
Hypothesis: Blue
Procedure: Green
Results: Red
Conclusion: Pink
By the time Elizabeth Klerman boards the train to go to her office at Brigham & Women's Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, the conductor has been awake for hours, rising in the dead of night for his first train at four o'clock. This schedule is not merely demanding, but contrary to most people's circadian rhythms, the pattern of physiological and metabolic activity that is roughly in synchrony with the rising and setting of the Sun.

NASA EARTH OBSERVATORY/NOAA NGDC
Exposure to light after sunset tricks the body into thinking it's still daytime, delaying the onset of 'biological' night.
“Some people are trying to live and work with an abnormal relationship between their circadian rhythm and the clock,” says Klerman, who studies human sleep patterns. Most of us have experienced this mismatch in the form of jetlag. For shift-workers and others with 'unnatural' routines, however, this desynchronization occurs every day and can result in chronic sleep deficits. Researchers are now trying to understand the prevalence and severity of the problem, and to devise strategies that can help reset these clocks.

The time machine

Many body tissues have their own timetables, organized by cyclic oscillations in the expression of a network of numerous 'clock genes'. “The entire body is a clock,” says Derk-Jan Dijk, director of the Surrey Sleep Research Centre in Guildford, UK. “It's a house with clocks in every room and every corner, yet in one way or another they work in an organized way.” The timing of all these various 'peripheral oscillators' can profoundly affect metabolic activity, immune cell proliferation, and numerous other critical functions. But there is a central pacemaker that gives the body a sense of the time of day: the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), a group of neurons in the hypothalamus (see 'The anatomy of sleep', page S2).
When melanopsin photoreceptors in the eye detect light, the SCN is activated and responds by initiating a host of rhythm-establishing physiological responses, including suppressing production of the hormone melatonin by the pineal gland (see 'The light switch'). The peripheral oscillators can be shifted by physical activity or by altering meal times, but most research suggests that light exposure is by far the most important determinant of rhythms driven by the SCN. “If you look at the data for humans, every time they suggested that exercise or food may shift the clock, they also suggest that light may have been involved,” says Debra Skene, who studies chronobiology at the University of Surrey, UK.
Light is the dominant influence on circadian rhythms, but other factors can come into play. A small subset of completely blind people who lack melanopsin photoreceptors, for example, can still achieve some circadian entrainment through external cues and lifestyle1. This timetable can be shattered by a trip across a few time zones, however, requiring long periods of readjustment without the assistance of light to signal the time of day. Many other totally blind individuals fail to entrain at all, with profound effects. “They sleep at night because that's when they're told to sleep, so they have very short sleep of poor quality, and at lunchtime their circadian system starts saying they should go to sleep,” says Skene. “So we see them extremely tired — they nap and they don't perform well.”

Basic instincts

Humans are diurnal animals and so tend to be active by day and rest at night. But personal preferences for when to sleep can differ considerably among individuals, and even at different stages in the same person's life — the difference between being early birds or night owls.
Researchers are still grappling with the best approach to measure the innate timing of someone's internal clock. As an indicator of 'biological night', levels of melatonin in various body fluids can give researchers a way to monitor the SCN cycle directly in an individual. But this requires repeated body fluid sampling over extended periods, and is therefore impractical for population-scale studies. Instead, most sleep researchers rely on surveys in which people self-report their sleeping habits.
One of the biggest surveys of sleeping habits, with more than 150,000 respondents from around the world, is the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire (MCTQ), run by Till Roenneberg at the Ludwig Maximilians University in Munich, Germany. His team devised an online survey that asks people to describe the timing of their sleep behaviour on a day-to-day basis, both on normal working or school days and at weekends or holidays. By characterizing individual sleep patterns — what Roenneberg calls a 'chronotype' — it is possible to quantify habits previously observed only at an anecdotal level, such as the tendencies of children to wake early and of teenagers to sleep late. “We were able to show how drastically the clock gets later from childhood through adolescence, reaching peak lateness in women at 19-and-a-half and in men at 21, and after those ages people get earlier again until they die,” says Roenneberg.

Alarm clock shock

The MCTQ data have also provided insights into how our biology is altered by living and working in the artificially illuminated, industrialized world2. By assessing both rural and urban populations, Roenneberg and others have shown how modern life scatters people's sleep patterns even further around the clock. “If we were all farmers, working outside all day, chronotypes would vary only by three to four hours,” says Roenneberg. “But since most of us work predominantly indoors and use artificial light after sunset, our clocks don't receive strong synchronizing signals anymore, and chronotypes nowadays span up to 12 hours.”
Circadian desynchrony is most acute in people whose work schedules make them live nocturnal lives. “They are exposed to a very complex light–dark cycle, where there is artificial light at night but still some natural light that you may see during the commute home or to work,” says Dijk. “In the majority of those types of shift workers, their central clock does not adapt.”
Roenneberg's team has found that circadian desynchrony may be far more pervasive, however. Many modern workers effectively live on two different timetables — one enforced by their weekday alarm clock, and the other aligned to their weekend socializing and 'sleeping in' — resulting in disruption that he has dubbed 'social jetlag'3. “In most people, it looks as if they were travelling from Europe to the United States on a Friday evening and back on a Monday morning, because their displacement is so large,” says Roenneberg. This disconnect begins at adolescence, when our body clocks reach their latest preferred wake time, and continues all the way to retirement age.
People who operate on schedules not aligned to their internal rhythms, either due to shift work or social jetlag, often exhibit signs of chronic sleep restriction or disruption that can impair both job performance and overall wellbeing. “During wakefulness, you will have problems maintaining sustained attention,” says Dijk. “You will be sleepier and experience disruption in working memory — you will see the effects across all cognitive domains.”
In the long term, such desynchrony can exacerbate the risk of cardiovascular disease, obesity and other health problems3, 4 (see 'Heavy sleepers', page S8). “In our animal models of 'clock gene' mutations, we're seeing diabetes and a propensity for obesity and metabolic disorders,” says Joseph Takahashi, who studies circadian rhythms at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas. Several studies have found a similar connection in shift workers and other individuals operating on schedules not aligned to their internal rhythms3, 4. These findings “don't necessarily mean that there are immediate health consequences”, says Dijk, “but we can see the impact of being asleep or being awake at the wrong phase of your circadian cycle immediately.”

Blue is the colour

At night, artificial lighting continues to activate the SCN and disrupt the natural release of melatonin, which normally heralds the onset of biological night (see 'Casting light on sleep deficiency', page S13). But not all light stimulates the SCN equally. Skene and others have shown that specific wavelengths are especially important 'waking' signals. “We observed peak light sensitivity at a wavelength of around 460 to 480 nanometres — a nice, deep blue,” she says. Red light, by contrast, has only a weak impact on melanopsin receptors and is less prone to stimulate wakefulness. So adjusting the relative levels of blue and red light that people are exposed to throughout the day could preserve normal circadian timing even during prolonged exposure to artificial light.
Klerman is collaborating with her colleague Steven Lockley at Brigham & Women's Hospital and with George Brainard of Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to test this approach in an extreme situation: the International Space Station. Long-term isolation in cramped quarters poses many problems for astronauts, and they also experience disorienting light–dark cycles resulting from the station's orbital time of 90 minutes. “This is too short for our circadian system to synchronize,” says Lockley. “The body clock starts to free run on its own time, just like for blind people.” This is further confounded by the need to interact with people operating on various Earth schedules, such as mission control in the United States or crews arriving from Russia.
Lockley and colleagues previously showed that blue light could help to synchronize Earth-based crews with the Martian day as part of the Phoenix Mars Lander mission5. The researchers are now exploring programmable LED (light-emitting diode) systems that dynamically shift from blue-enriched to red-enriched white light on a 24-hour cycle. “We're working on shifting people's rhythms more quickly and maintaining their alertness at a better level,” says Lockley.
This technology may be most valuable in extreme places such as spacecraft, submarines or Antarctic research facilities, but the broader potential is obvious. The electronics company Philips, based in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, is one of several developing controllable, dynamic lighting systems for homes, schools and offices that boost blue wavelengths early in the day and in the post-lunch slump, and shift to redder wavelengths later in the afternoon.

A dose of rhythm

It is not yet known whether these lighting systems will be effective in groups composed of people with widely varying chronotypes, but drugs that tinker with circadian rhythms could provide a more personalized approach. The hormone melatonin may not be sufficient by itself to send someone to sleep, but it nevertheless helps the body to prepare for sleep, and there is evidence it can affect the timing of sleep. “The general consensus is that melatonin can phase-shift circadian rhythms when properly applied,” says Klerman. Indeed, a growing body of work suggests that the combination of properly timed melatonin dosing and managed light exposure can counter the circadian problems associated with both jetlag and shift work6.
Melatonin requires a prescription in Europe but is available over the counter at health-food stores in the United States. However, the US Food and Drug Administration has limited oversight over the quality and content of such 'natural supplements', so it is difficult for US consumers to achieve correct dosing. As a more reliable alternative, several drug companies are developing synthetic agents that mimic the effects of melatonin, such as tasimelteon, developed by Vanda Pharmaceuticals in Washington, DC. Klerman and colleagues have shown that tasimelteon can improve sleep quality in time-shifted human subjects7, and it is now in a phase III clinical trial for use in blind individuals who lack melanopsin receptors. Such people “have recurrent jetlag”, says Klerman, “so they are an ideal population that you would want to try to entrain with melatonin agonists.”
Several other potential circadian modulators have been discovered in the past two years. Pharmacology researcher Thomas Burris and colleagues at the Scripps Research Institute in Jupiter, Florida, identified two compounds, for example, that alter circadian rhythms by acting on a key regulator of clock gene activity. These compounds, known as SR9009 and SR9011, also affect weight gain and metabolism in mice8. “Small molecules that can reset the clock might help in recovering from jetlag more rapidly,” says Takahashi, who collaborated with the Burris team and has launched a circadian drug-discovery company, Reset Therapeutics, based in Burlingame, California. He adds that circadian drugs could potentially treat metabolic problems associated with off-kilter body clocks, and counter the disturbed sleep that commonly afflicts elderly people.
“I'm not comfortable with using medication to align people to what society wants.”
It is less clear whether these drugs would be an appropriate solution for chronic, lifestyle-associated jetlag, however. “Medication should be used if people are sick,” says Roenneberg. “I'm not comfortable with using medication to align people to what society wants.” As an alternative, he recommends designing work schedules to suit individual employees and their particular chronotype, which can be determined by questionnaires such as the MCTQ.

Smart schedules

Several industries are already using smarter schedules and training methodologies that maximize the health, performance and efficiency of their workers. Major corporations such as Procter & Gamble and Goldman Sachs are using 'sleep hygiene' programmes based on circadian research to keep their personnel sharp — for example, coaching staff to optimize their individual sleep schedules, and to switch off laptops and e-readers in advance of bedtime. The need for such efforts is especially keen in industries with round-the-clock operations — particularly those where working while tired could prove fatal, such as mining or manufacturing. In aviation, the US Federal Aviation Administration has recently put in place 'fatigue risk management systems' that aim to improve the safety of air travel by using carefully regulated work schedules and mandated rest time to minimize flight-crew fatigue.
However, Lockley questions the wisdom of retraining the public to adapt to schedules that are contrary to their biological needs. “Where we have to have 24/7 society — in health and safety services, for example — we should do it,” he says. “But we should critically review whether we need 24-hour supermarkets or TV.”
To help people make the most of their sleep while also leading happy and productive lives, we need a better sense of what natural human sleep patterns really are, and how our lifestyles reshape them. But this requires more data. Several research groups are now working with pre-industrial communities in the Amazon to get a better understanding of how the natural human clock runs in a non-electric world. Meanwhile, Roenneberg hopes to build on the success of the MCTQ with a much broader Human Sleep Project that will bring together leading sleep researchers to characterize circadian rhythms and sleep patterns at the population scale.
Waking up early to start work at four o'clock in the morning may never be entirely natural for people such as Klerman's train conductor, but better insights into sleep management could make such schedules more comfortable and the transition from weekend to the working week less jarring. “We need huge databases where thousands to millions of people have contributed data from their daily life,” says Roenneberg. “Once we understand that, we can change our society and technology so that people can sleep in their proper, individual sleep windows.”

Sunday, August 18, 2013

Will Science Kill Religeon? SCE-2

Religion versus science
 
Will Science kill religion?
http://www.voki.com/pickup.php?scid=8454569&height=400&width=300

An ongoing question throughout the world. Religion is based on authority, its the bonding of scripture and trying to build on scientific to create superficial beliefs. 92% of Americans answered, 'yes' when they where asked if they believed in God, but 47% of American's responded, that they didn't believe in the creation of the first 7 days. Though many religious people have made calculated guesses based on what they've read in the bible, most bow to what science has said based on experiments and precisely calculated guesses:

"It was Catholic Bishop James Ussher who calculated the age of the Earth that is still presented by Young Earth creationists as the true age of the planet. Though the Catholic Church once went after Galileo for claiming that the earth moved, they now accept that the age of the Earth is a matter for astrophysicists and geologists, not theologians."

Churches used to split weather blessing bread would actually turn the bread into human flesh, and wine into actual blood, or weather Jesus would save them in the apocalypse to come. Though these days are over, many churches still have divided people, though its not obvious, some believed that though, God is real he did not create the earth, perform miracles...etc.

So will science kill religion? Brian Schmied says, "I doubt it Religion is adapting. Most people rely on authority, and not everyone has the time, money, or inclination for the years of study needed to understand how each scientific truth has been determined. They will continue to bow to authority for the sake of having knowledge. As long as people submit to authority, they are open to suggestion, which makes them open to religion."            

Questions

1. Taking this into consideration and reading this thoroughly, I wonder weather or not he wrote this as a scientist or a religious person?

2. When he says "Religion is adapting." Did he mean that religion was something people pick up quickly or did he mean that people are able to create their own religion based on what they believe.

3. This battle is going to continue, based on this, what will win? Religion or science? Does there have to be an ongoing battle?

Brain Schmeid. 16 August 2013 http://www.scienceomega.com/article/1275/will-science-kill-religion

Tuesday, August 13, 2013

SCE-1 - See a fish Think

I read an article about fish today. I found this article to be intriguing at the least. The article was called, 'see a fish think' which was basically what the title say. Seeing is believing,” says Koichi Kawakami, a molecular and developmental biologist at Japan’s National Institute of Genetics. The team he put together tempered with the fish's DNA, injecting it with protein present only in neurons would fluoresce when the neurons were firing. Together the team watched how the fish's brain acted as it eyed and attacked it prey. They hope to take this research further in the future. I hope to learn more about this experiment in the future, I can't help but wonder how they will take this further? What more can come out of this? And, have scientist made a break through in how fish think and why?

Love,
   -JazzGirlOfSteel

Susanne Rust (2013). See a fish think. . Retrieved fromhttp://discovermagazine.com/2013/september/07-see-a-fish-think#.UgpTEX3fu5k

Friday, August 9, 2013

Fighting Fire With Sound

Watching a video on science projects enabled me to view the steps of doing a science project. I viewed the video called "Fighting Fire With Sound". In the video the students where presenting, using sound waves to extinguish fire, that being their purpose. Their hypothesis was that the sound waves would cause the pressure to drop, in turn making the fire extinguish. To start this experiment they lit a candle in a zero base gravity center, then surrounded it with speaker. They turned on the speakers but found that though the sound waves made the flame smaller, it did not completely put it out. In conclusion they found that it did effect the flame it did not completely put it out.

If you want to view this article yourself, here is the link-
 http://www.sciencedaily.com/videos/2006/1012-fighting_fire_with_sound.htm

Love,
       -JazzGirlOfSteel

Science News.com (October 1, 206). Fighting Fire With Sound. T. Retrieved fromhttp://www.sciencedaily.com/videos/2006/1012-fighting_fire_with_sound.htm

Thursday, August 8, 2013

Hello to all,
 Today is my first day on my Science Project blog. I will be updating frequently on this blog to keep you in touch of new discoveries or break throughs, in my project. I hope that you will support me in my journey to try to create a 'Bend and Lock Steel', which will be explained further on in the blog. In the next few posts I will be explaining what my project is and where I got my information or will be getting my info. The reasons for creating this blog is simple, 1: I wish for you embark this journey of discovery with me. 2: My Physical Science Class requires me to.

Love,                          
         -JazzGirlOfSteel